![]() |
|
|||||
New Books Section |
GFA Books Features: GalaxyFarAway.com Interview with Michael P. Kube-McDowell
DJ: Let's leave the Star Wars galaxy for a second. Your newest novel is called "The Trigger", and you wrote it in collaboration with the scifi literary legend Arthur C. Clarke. How did this collaboration come about?
MKM: Because of the time difference between Michigan and Sri Lanka, it was mostly done through e-mail, though we've also talked on the phone any number of times. Much of the research was done on the Net as well, and 99% of our contact with both the American and British publishers was over the Net. The very model of a modern novel. <g>
MKM:
These so-called junior-senior collaborations happen for a variety of reasons. Some are, frankly, just a way for the senior writer to "franchise" a fictional universe or a bankable name. Some are sincere efforts by the senior writer to "pay forward" by helping young writers establish themselves. In the case of both THE TRIGGER and Clarke's collaboration with Stephen Baxter, the reasons mostly have to do with Sir Arthur's health--he has a serious case of post-polio syndrome. By comparison, when I wrote "Isaac Asimov's Robot City" in 1985--the first of the so-called "sharecrop" or borrowed-universe novels... --I never spoke with Asimov, never corresponded with him. It was strictly a hired-pen situation, a work for hire. I don't think Asimov even wrote the outline for the ROBOT CITY series. I think you can often get a clue as to the kind of "collaboration" you're holding by looking at the copyright.
MKM: I don't think THE TRIGGER is a didactic novel--one that tells you what should be done, what you should believe. It's a speculation on what might happen if we found ourselves with a weapon against firearms. The prime movers in the story are meliorists--they think that the world can be made better through human effort, and they find themselves with a tool that they can use in that effort. But the characters are speaking for themselves, not for the authors. I think the last couple of pages of the book underline that. Nevertheless, I think it's fair to say that Sir Arthur and I both see the gun culture in which so much of the world is immersed as tragically destructive. Sir Arthur has been witness to two decades of terrorism and guerilla warfare by the Tamil Tigers against the government of Sri Lanka, and here in America I've had to watch what seems like an ever-increasing parade of empathy-dead children, disgruntled employees, and disaffected "patriots" make their way to the headlines and the evening news. I think if you're paying attention at all, it has to have an effect on how you react to the idea of unrestricted 'gun rights'. And maybe that's a good way to think about THE TRIGGER, too. It doesn't take a stand on guns and violence, but it does take a hard look at them, and at how the issue divides us, and at the price we pay for the choices we've made. THE TRIGGER is about the idea that if we had other choices, those who live in hope of something better would try to lead us there. Or drag us there.
MKM: I grew up reading science fiction that was hopeful about the future, that implicitly accepted the idea that we can do better. I still prefer that flavor in the storytelling mix. Advice for new writers? <sigh> It's a very tough business right now. Much more so than when I broke in. Especially for science fiction writers (as opposed to fantasy writers). I think the old maxim applies double now--don't quit your day job. There is still room for new voices, but it's harder than ever to make a living unless you have break-out bestseller success early. So write what you love, if you're writing for love. And if some measure of commercial success comes out of that, count your blessings. I've worked like a dog, and I've also been very lucky. And I count my blessings every day I'm able to continue doing this for a living.
MKM: You're welcome.
|
| ||||